AB 1217 AB 1321 Anthony Portantino Budget Reserves Featured Jerry Hill Patrick O'Donnell Policy and Legislation Robert Hertzberg SB 328 SB 751 Shirley Weber Tony Thurmond Travel Unsorted

Legislation roundup: STEM school, later school start, ‘meal shaming,’ budget reserves; what passed and what didn’t

Legislation roundup: STEM school, later school start, ‘meal shaming,’ budget reserves; what passed and what didn’t

LWYang / Flickr

California State Meeting chambers

Within the last hours of the California legislative session, there was plenty of drama with out passage of payments to mandate a later begin to center and excessive faculties and create a state STEM school in Los Angeles. There was success with out drama for payments to finish “meal shaming” of youngsters with out cash for school lunches and to let districts hold extra money of their budget reserves. These have been among the many essential schooling payments that lawmakers acted on — or postpone until subsequent yr. What follows are a recap of different payments that EdSource adopted.

Late school begin: Failed

Legislation meant to ban all public center and excessive faculties from beginning their common school days earlier than eight:30 a.m. failed within the late hours of the session, however the writer vows to attempt once more subsequent yr.

Sen. Anthony Portantino, D-La Canada Flintridge, authored Senate Invoice 328, citing analysis displaying it’s troublesome for teenagers to fall asleep early within the night and rise up early within the morning. Sleep deprivation, analysis exhibits, can result in melancholy, poor grades, dropping out of school, weight problems, automotive accidents, and even suicide.  The regulation wouldn’t apply to so-called “zero” durations, which some faculties supply earlier than the common school day begins.

The invoice garnered robust help from the California PTA, California Federation of Academics, quite a few medical faculties and a number of school districts. Nevertheless it was opposed by the California Academics Affiliation, California School Boards Affiliation and others who stated the state ought to let school districts determine when to start out school based mostly on their communities’ wants.

What occurred: The Senate passed SB 328 in Might, in a 25-13 vote. The Meeting amended the invoice to make clear that it will additionally apply to constitution faculties and to induce the state Division of Schooling to submit info on its web site about analysis supporting later school begin occasions for adolescents, nevertheless it was defeated in a 26-30 vote on Sept. 14, with 23 members not voting. Assemblyman Todd Gloria, D-San Diego, moved to rethink the invoice, however the Meeting didn’t act on it Friday, so it might be introduced again subsequent yr. It stays to be seen whether or not school districts will bounce on the late begin bandwagon with no state mandate.

Portantino on Friday informed the Los Angeles Occasions he’s “disappointed in the opposition that promoted non-science and unsubstantiated arguments against SB 328, forcing us to move this fight for our children’s health to January.  I’m committed to this issue and I will continue to work to see it become law.”

STEM school: Stalled

A late-session press to determine the primary state-created school in science, math and engineering stumbled Friday, the final day of the Legislature’s session, when the co-authors of AB 1217, struggled to discover a majority within the Senate and pulled it from consideration.

Sen. Anthony Portantino, D-La Canada Flintridge, and co-author Assemblyman Raul Bocanegra, D-Pacoima, could have the remainder of the yr to regroup. However they’ll want to reply higher to school administration teams and unions important not of the idea of a STEM center and excessive school in Los Angeles, serving primarily low-income, minority youngsters, however the rationale for bypassing native districts to authorize it.

“We’re supportive of the intent to develop a STEM school with civic leaders and higher education, but they should not have gone directly to the Legislature,” stated Edgar Zazueta, senior director of governmental relations and coverage for the Affiliation of California School Directors.

Who “they” are is a thriller. Universities together with Cal Tech and UCLA say they’d parnter with it, and philanthropist Eli Broad stated he’d fund it. However Bocanegra and Portantino gained’t determine the first organizers. Whoever they’re arrange an internet site to advertise the thought final week and apparently employed the politically well-connected communications agency Mercury California.

On Thursday, the Los Angeles Occasions editorial board endorsed the thought with the headline “A state-sponsored STEM school for L.A.’s poorest kids is a slap in the face to LAUSD — but it’s necessary.” To no avail. Zazueta stated the invoice would have confronted an in depth vote within the Senate, adopted instantly by a harder reception within the Meeting.

Underneath the invoice, a seven-member nonprofit board, with 4 members named by the governor and Legislature, would run the school. The state superintendent would monitor it. It will resemble a constitution school in lots of respects — minus supervision of an area district (see earlier protection). That’s a sticking level for opponents.

“We appreciate the authors’ interest in supporting STEM programs and career technical opportunities, but we must insist that the state respect the charter school petition process and allow the local school districts and community to evaluate their educational needs,” stated Sara Bachez, assistant government director of governmental relations for the California Affiliation of School Enterprise Officers.


Later school begin invoice strikes ahead

Ending meal shaming: Passed

College students in California whose households owe cash for school lunches will not be given solely a snack — a cheese stick, an apple and a glass of milk — or nothing in any respect, till they’re all paid up. They’ll get the identical meal as all the opposite college students, underneath a invoice the Legislature passed final week.

With the unanimous passage of SB 250, by Sen. Robert Hertzberg, D-Los Angeles, California will be a part of a motion to not maintain youngsters hostage for the money owed of their mother and father. The invoice will even finish “meal shaming,” the apply utilized in some districts throughout the nation of verbally reprimanding college students within the lunch line or stamping youngsters’s arms as a reminder to their mother and father they owe cash.

A survey by the Western Middle on Regulation and Poverty, which supported Hertzberg’s invoice, discovered that many districts didn’t submit their insurance policies for college kids in arrears. Of people who did, a number of dozen served lower than a totally dietary meal. Torrance Unified, for instance, offers “a snack consisting of crackers, a milk and fruit/veggies when a middle or high school student reaches a $0 balance.” The insurance policies solely apply to college students whose households don’t qualify for federal meal subsidies.

Seeing laws coming, this yr Elk Grove Unified ended its coverage of giving youngsters in debt solely a cheese sandwich. Michelle Drake, director of Meals and Vitamin Providers for the district, advised the Sacramento Bee that meals service staff inspired the change. “It’s just not good for our children and it’s difficult on the staff. The last thing they want to see is a 3rd-grader and 4th-grader with that look on their face. We have changed it up for this school year.”

The invoice particularly says that districts aren’t required indefinitely to provide mother and father a move on not paying. As an alternative it requires that districts do all they will to enroll households within the sponsored school lunch program and notify households  — not invoice collectors — of unpaid balances as quickly as they’re 10 days behind.

The state PTA and the California Academics Affiliation have been amongst organizations backing the invoice. There have been no registered opponents.

Reserve cap: Deal reached

The battle is over. The California Academics Affiliation and the California School Boards Affiliation have compromised to finish a Three-year battle over how a lot cash school districts can hold in reserve for emergencies. It had turn into a check of wills on an abstruse difficulty involving intricacies of Proposition 98, the components that units annual Okay-12 revenues.

In 2014, the CTA persuaded Gov. Jerry Brown to incorporate a cap on district reserves, as a result of it suspected that districts, in post-recession warning, have been hoarding cash that must be spent on college students (and instructor pay raises). The cap would take impact, underneath some circumstances, in favorable income years, after the Legislature put cash for faculties in a state reserve. In that case, districts must decrease their reserves to a mean of 6 % of their Basic Fund income.

School teams, calling it an intrusion on native management, insisted on a full repeal. They usually stated the restrict was too low, probably jeopardizing solvency — particularly for small districts extra weak to unexpected occasions

The deal: Assemblyman Patrick O’Donnell, D-Lengthy Seashore, a CTA ally, and Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, on behalf of the school teams, negotiated the compromise in Hill’s SB 751:

  • The cap on districts would take impact the yr after the Legislature contributed Three % of the Basic Fund into the state Okay-12 reserve — at present about $2 billion;
  • All districts with fewer than 2,501 college students — half of the districts within the state — can be exempt; so would primary assist districts, people who fund faculties by way of native property taxes;
  • The mixed cap on assigned reserves (cash designated for particular functions) and unassigned reserves can be 10 % of a district’s Basic Fund.
  • As beneath the present regulation, county superintendents might grant districts an exemption in two consecutive years out of three.
  • Districts already had one other escape valve: With a vote in public, boards might put aside further cash for a selected objective in what’s referred to as an outlined reserve. SB 751 gained’t change that.

The cap has but to been triggered, and it’s troublesome to forecast when, or even when, will probably be, however Hill, in a press release, stated the brand new limits will assist districts higher put together for the longer term. “California voters understand the importance of saving for economic downturns — they approved a rainy day fund for the entire state to prevent devastating cuts in the future,” Hill stated. “This bill allows school districts to save for fiscal uncertainties and prevent adverse impacts to students and teachers.”

Sanctuary state: Passed

SB 54, by state Senate President professional Tem Kevin De León, D-Los Angeles, prohibits native police and different authorities — together with those that work at faculties — from cooperating with federal immigration brokers with no warrant. Immigrants make up 30 % of California’s inhabitants, and half of the state’s youngsters have at the very least one father or mother who’s foreign-born, in response to the Public Coverage Institute of California. De León stated the invoice will bolster belief between immigrant communities and state businesses, and result in enhancements in public security, school attendance and public well being.

Dozens of cities and school districts round California have already declared themselves protected havens or sanctuaries, providing various levels of protections for immigrants. The Trump administration, in the meantime, has threatened to withhold grants for so-called sanctuary cities and states, saying they hinder the federal authorities’s means to implement immigration legal guidelines. The California State Sheriffs’ Affiliation opposed the invoice, saying they will’t afford to lose federal grants and ought to have the pliability to cooperate with federal immigration brokers in sure conditions. Different regulation enforcement officers, together with Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck, are supporting the invoice. Underneath strain from Gov. Jerry Brown, the invoice was amended in early September to broaden the record of crimes for which native regulation enforcement would notify federal immigration officers.

What occurred: The invoice passed the state Senate on April Three by a vote of 27-12. The Meeting passed the invoice on Friday, and Brown stated he plans to signal it.

Instructor tenure: Held by writer

The probationary interval for brand spanking new academics in most states is three years or longer. In California, it’s technically two years, although realistically 18 months, because the deadline for notifying academics within the second yr is March 15. AB 1220, by Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, would give districts the choice of extending probation to a 3rd yr once they consider academics may benefit from extra supervision.

Weber argued districts typically dismiss promising academics quite than grant them the lifetime due-process protections referred to as tenure. The California Academics Affiliation responded that a longer probationary interval would ship a unfavorable message to potential academics, compounding the state’s instructor scarcity. The CTA needs due-process rights for probationary academics in trade for an additional yr of probation. See earlier EdSource protection.

What occurred: In July, Assemblyman Tony Thurmond, D-Richmond, a candidate for state superintendent of public instruction, launched a competing invoice, AB 1164,  that additionally would allow a 3rd probationary yr, however incorporates circumstances and restrictions, advocated by the academics unions, that aren’t in Weber’s invoice. It might restore for third-year probationary academics the appropriate of evidentiary hearings and different due-process necessities, opposed by school districts, that probationary academics had earlier than the regulation was modified many years in the past. In July, first Weber, then Thurmond, pulled their payments from consideration. The battle over tenure will possible resume subsequent yr.

English learner reclassification: Held by the writer

Researchers and advocates for English learners agree that figuring out when English learners are proficient in English, which means they not want language help, must be uniform — however are preventing over how to do that. SB 463, by Sen. Ricardo Lara, D-Bell Gardens, would standardize the 4 present reclassification standards: efficiency on the state evaluation of English language proficiency; analysis by academics; session with mother and father; and the mastery of primary expertise, similar to English-only college students, on the Smarter Balanced evaluation. Researchers and academicians need outcomes on the brand new English language fluency check, referred to as ELPAC, to be the first issue; the check will debut in 2018.

 A 2014 research discovered that the majority districts undertake extra rigorous, typically subjective standards for figuring out English proficiency, and a delay in reclassification can deny English learners entry to school prep programs. Invoice proponents, who embrace the nonprofit Californians Collectively, fear that untimely reclassification will deny English learners wanted helps. They level out that a failure to offer English learners with entry to college-qualifying programs is a district failure, not a reclassification problem. See earlier EdSource protection.

What occurred: Unable to resolve the disagreements, Lara pulled the invoice and will deliver it again subsequent yr.

Fiscal transparency: Bottled up

Legislation that started off requiring faculties to element their spending underneath the Native Management Funding Components passed the Meeting 77-Zero within the spring — a sign that many lawmakers need extra transparency on how a lot cash low-income college students, English learners and foster youth obtain beneath the formulation in every school they attend. However AB 1321 confronted robust opposition by academics unions and school boards and directors organizations, who argued the funding components regulation deliberately distributes cash by district, not by school. Gov. Jerry Brown agrees.

Writer Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, seeing uncertainty within the Senate, amended her invoice, leaving intact a key provision: Beginning in 2018-19, the federal Each Scholar Succeeds Act requires all faculties to report how a lot income they obtain yearly from federal, state and native sources. Districts’ expenditures have to be based mostly on precise instructor salaries, not district averages — a big change. Weber’s invoice would have required state officers to determine uniform reporting standards in order that faculties’ revenues might be meaningfully in contrast.

What occurred: This month, the Senate Appropriations Committee determined to carry the invoice with no rationalization, because it has the facility to do, stalling it for the yr. That leaves up within the air whether or not the State Board of Schooling and the Brown administration on their very own would require uniform reporting necessities, stated Brad Robust, senior director of schooling coverage for Youngsters Now, a co-sponsor of the invoice. Weber could possibly convey the invoice up once more in 2018.

Constitution laws

For-profit charters, public data: Failed in committee

SB 806, by Sen. Steve Glazer, D-Orinda, would ban a for-profit entity from partaking in sure constitution school actions, together with collaborating in a candidate evaluate or being concerned in appointing or choosing members of the nonprofit constitution operator’s board of administrators. It additionally would prohibit greater than 50 % of the full-time academics of a constitution school from being staff of a for-profit entity.

This invoice additionally would make clear that the governing physique of a constitution school is topic to the California Public Data Act.

The invoice passed within the Senate Schooling Committee however failed within the Senate Judiciary Committee; it may be reconsidered subsequent yr.

Get rid of constitution school appeals: No vote taken

SB 808, by Sen. Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia, would get rid of the present proper of operators of proposed constitution faculties to attraction a denial of their proposal by an area school district to the county workplace of schooling or to the State Board of Schooling. Solely the school district inside which the constitution school can be situated would determine.

Testimony was heard however no vote was taken within the Senate Schooling Committee.

Entry to amenities for charters: Died in committee

SB 765, by Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, would require school districts to provide constitution faculties the primary proper to accumulate any extra property or amenities that a district was planning to promote or lease.

It passed the Senate in Might however was held within the Meeting Schooling Committee by Chairman Patrick O’Donnell, D-Lengthy Seashore, in July. No vote was taken.

EdSource writers John Fensterwald, Theresa Harrington, Carolyn Jones and George White contributed to this text. 


fbq(‘init’, ‘1049081075186735’);
fbq(‘monitor’, “PageView”);
fbq(‘monitor’, ‘ViewContent’);